Stakeholder interviews
that define your platform needs.
Proven Discovery runs two rounds of structured, AI-facilitated conversations with your stakeholders, then synthesizes the transcripts into a software platform requirements brief. No forms, no fixed questions, no spreadsheet of notes to reconcile.
Platform decisions fail when discovery is too shallow.
Current tools, workarounds, data gaps, permissions, and integration pain are usually scattered across teams. The signal in those conversations rarely makes it into platform decisions intact.
Let every role describe the current workflow. Let the model do the synthesis.
Each stakeholder gets a private link. They have a conversation, in their own words, on their own time. Round one surfaces the current-state platform gaps. Round two defines requirements, constraints, and evaluation criteria. Claude reads every transcript and produces a single, citable platform brief you can share.
Four moves, end to end.
Most teams go from kickoff to an approved platform requirements brief inside two weeks. The admin runs the assessment from a single dashboard. Stakeholders never log in.
- 01
Frame the platform need
Use the platform intake chat to sharpen the needs statement, attach context, and pick stakeholders. When it feels right, click Create Assessment from Brief.
- 02
Round 1: current state
Each stakeholder gets a tokenized link. Claude runs an open conversation focused on current workflows, tools, gaps, and workarounds. Voice or text. About 10 minutes.
- 03
Round 2: requirements
After Round 1 synthesizes, stakeholders get a follow-up that defines platform requirements, tradeoffs, integrations, data needs, and success criteria.
- 04
Brief, generated and reviewed
Claude writes a structured Software Platform Requirements Brief. Share it for stakeholder review, collect section-level feedback, then approve. Export to PDF or JSON.
A platform needs workflow you can actually run twice.
Conversational, not survey-shaped
Claude follows up, clarifies, and changes direction the way a senior operator would. Stakeholders get a real interview, not a form.
Two rounds by design
Current state first, requirements second. Round 2 is grounded in Round 1 synthesis, so requirements are informed by what stakeholders actually said.
One brief, every voice
The synthesis cites themes across stakeholders. You see who raised what, what concerns recurred, and what is genuinely contested.
Section level review
Stakeholders mark each section approve, comment, concern, or edit. You see the heat map of disagreement before you ship.
Anonymized when needed
Toggle anonymization at project creation. Names are stripped from synthesis and exports. Useful for sensitive orgs and exec interviews.
Export everything
Download the platform brief as PDF, or pull the full project as JSON: transcripts, summaries, feedback, status history. No lock-in.
Always know what is blocking the next step.
Every project has a diagnostics view. It shows who has finished, what synthesis exists, and what is keeping you from advancing. Force-status is there if you need to override, but you usually do not.
Run your next platform decision as a real assessment.
Early access is filling up. Join the waitlist and we will email you when your spot opens.